Those Dedicated to Limiting Harmful Posts Worry About Twitter Under Musk

SAN FRANCISCO – After Brianna Wu, a software engineer and game developer, faced violent threats on Twitter in 2014 as part of a virulent campaign that came to be known as “Gamergate,” she worked with the company to build tools to expose misogyny, violence. and disinformation online.

Today she worries that all that could be undone by Twitter’s new owner: Elon Musk, the richest man in the world, who reached a deal to buy Twitter this week for roughly $ 44 billion.

Mr. Musk’s vow to protect free speech as he “unlocks” the company’s potential has raised alarms among those who, in some cases, have devoted carers to combat toxic and at times dangerous flows of misinformation and disinformation.

Although his exact plans remain unclear, he cites his promises to remove barriers to free speech, as well as provocative of his own record, at times insulting, statements on Twitter, including calling a British diver involved in the 2018 rescue of children trapped in a cave in Thailand a pedophile.

“I think it’s going to just be a free-for-all,” Ms. Wu said in a telephone interview.

For Media Matters for America, the liberal-leaning research organization, causes for concern could be found in the celebratory responses from people Twitter had expunged from the platform for violating its rules of behavior.

They include prominent conservative figures like Steve Bannon and Representative Marjorie Taylor Green; the broadcaster Infowars; And even a QAnon figure called “Clandestine,” who helped spread a Russian conspiracy theory about American biological weapons labs in Ukraine.

Angelo Carusone, president of Media Matters for America, said that Mr. Musk would have the power to unwind as Twitter’s sole proprietor of many attempts to put the company in the vanguard of social media companies when it came to restricting harmful or hateful abuses.

In a tweet, he compared Mr. Musk’s takeover of the launch of Fox News in the name of providing a balance to what its founders, Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes, saw as “liberal media.”

Though smaller than other platforms – with 217 million daily users, compared with billions on Facebook and Instagram – Twitter’s moderation efforts served as an example that campaigners like Mr. Carusone could point to when urging other companies to rein in dangerous misinformation.

“Do I think Elon Musk is going to be addressing the problem of disinformation and rising extremism? No, I just don’t, “he said, adding,” I think there’s a very strong case to be made that there’s going to be a dilution of whatever policies Twitter has in place. “

Mr. Musk’s fortune and celebrity – he’s also behind Tesla and SpaceX – will give him a powerful bully pulpit in roiling debates over free speech of the limits, which he called “a bedrock of a functioning democracy” announcing the purchase on Monday. General Chat Chat Lounge

He could also face financial and political constraints, like a new law by the European Union requiring social media platforms to scrub their sites of misinformation and abuse. That could temper some of the “sky is falling” fears of his takeover.

At least one idea he has floated, making public the algorithms the company has designed, echoes those put forward by people in favor of reducing harmful content.

They include, most prominently, former President Barack Obama, who outlined a vision for combating disinformation at a conference at Stanford University that included subjecting algorithms to greater scrutiny and regulation.

“The real problem,” said Rachel Goodman, Counsel for Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan nonprofit, “is that how we share and advance knowledge and debate of the future central to our democracy should not depend on a single person in control. is a superhero or supervillain. “

Leave a Comment