Sheldon Krimsky, Who Warned Of Profit Motive In Science, Dies At 80

Sheldon Krimsky, a leading scholar of environmental ethics who explored issues in the nexus of science, ethics and biotechnology, and who warned of the perils of private companies underwriting and influencing academic research, died on April 23 in Cambridge, Mass. He was 80.

His family said he was at a hospital for tests when he died, and that they didn’t know the cause.

Dr. Krimsky, who taught at Tufts University in Massachusetts for 47 years, warned in a broad way about the growing conflicts of interest that universities faced as grants from their academic scholars accepted dollars from corporate entities like pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies.

In his book “Science in the Private Interest” (2003), he argued that the profits of the lure were potentially corrupting research and the process undermining the integrity and independence of universities.

But his wide-ranging public policy work went way beyond flagging the dangers inherent in the commercialization of science. The author, co-author or editor of 17 books and more than 200 journal articles, delved into numerous scientific fields – stem-cell research, genetic modification of food and DNA privacy among them – and sought to pinpoint potential problems.

“He was the Ralph Nader of bioethics,” said Jonathan Garlick, a stem-cell researcher at Tufts and a friend of Dr. Krimsky, said in a phone interview, referring to the longtime consumer advocate.

“He was saying, if we didn’t slow down and pay attention to important check points, once you let the genie out of the bottle there might be irreversible harm that could persist across many people,” Dr. Garlick added. “He wanted to protect us from irreversible harm.”

In “Genetic Justice” (2012), Dr. Krimsky wrote that DNA evidence is not always reliable, and that government agencies had created large DNA databases that posed a threat to civil liberties. In “The GMO Deception” (2014), which he edited with Jeremy Gruber, he criticized the agriculture and food industries for changing the genetic makeup of foods.

His last book, published in 2021, was “Understanding DNA Ancestry,” in which he explained the complexities of ancestry research and said that results from different genetic ancestry testing companies could vary in their conclusions. Most recently, he was exploring the emerging topic of stem-cell meat – meat made from animal cells that could grow into a lab.

Mr. Nader, in fact, had a long association with Dr. Krimsky and the introduction to some of his books.

“There was really no one like him: rigorous, courageous, and prolific,” Mr. Nader said in an email. “He tried to convey the importance of democratic processes in open scientific decision making in many areas. He criticized scientific dogmas, saying that science must always leave open options for revision. “

Credit …Rowman & Littlefield Publishers

Sheldon Krimsky was born on June 26, 1941, in Brooklyn. His father, Alex, was a house painter. His mother, Rose (Skolnick) Krimsky, was a garment worker.

Sheldon, known as Shelly, majored in physics and math at Brooklyn College and graduated in 1963. He earned a master’s of science degree in physics at Purdue University in 1965. At Boston University, he earned a master’s of arts degree in philosophy and 1968. A doctorate in the philosophy of science in 1970.

He met Carolyn Boriss, who was an artist and teacher and later became a playwright and writer, in Cambridge in 1968. They were married in 1970.

She survives him, as does a daughter, Alyssa Krimsky Clossey; a son, Eliot; three grandchildren; and a brother, Sidney.

Dr. Krimsky began his association with Tufts in what is now called the Department of Urban and Environmental Policy and Planning in 1974 and helped build it up over the decades. He also taught Ethics at the Tufts University School of Medicine and was a visiting scholar at Columbia University, Brooklyn College, the New School and New York University.

He began to explore conflicts of interest in academic research in the late 1970s when he led a team of students in an investigation into the chemical company WR Grace had contaminated drinking wells in Acton, Mass.

Dr. Krimsky said that when the company learned he would be releasing a negative report – the wells were later designated a Superfund site – one of its top executives asked the president’s Tufts to study the fire and fire him. The president refused. But Dr. Krimsky was upset that the company had tried to interfere, and it prompted him to start learning how corporations, whether or not they had made financial contributions, sought to manipulate science.

“He spoke truth to power,” Dr. Garlick said. “He wanted to give voice to skepticism and give voice to the skeptics.”

Dr. Krinsky was a longtime proponent of what he called “organized skepticism.”

“When claims are made, you have to start with skepticism until the evidence is strong enough that your skepticism disappears,” he told The Boston Globe in 2014. “You don’t start science by saying, ‘Yes, I like this hypothesis. and it must be true. ‘”

He was a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and headed its committee on scientific freedom and responsibility from 1988 to 1992. He was also a fellow of the Hastings Center on Bioethics and served on the editorial boards of seven scientific journals.

When he wasn’t working, he liked to play the guitar and harmonica. He divided his time between Cambridge and New York City.

“Shelly never gave up hope of a better world,” said Julian Agyeman, a professor in Dr. Krimsky’s department and its interim chairman were quoted as saying in a Tufts obituary. “He was the consummate activist-advocate-scholar.”

Leave a Comment